構造改革、民営化、市場原理主義の虚妄から、マインドコントロールを解くための参考図書館

« Tsuruta Koji--I cared for you | トップページ | Handlers »

Barney Frank

バーニーフランク米国議会議員はどんな人物か。

今日のワシントンからのニュースである。米軍の海外基地の問題について、発言するベテラン議員のニュースである。自立…自尊の日本を追求することが長期的に安定する日米関係の基礎になる。http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=128434888

なんと、共和党のロン・ポール議員と、バーニー・フランク議員が、連名で、米国の海外軍事基地の問題についての声明を発表した。フランク議員はみんしゅとうであるから、普通は水と油の関係であるが、アメリカの安全保障に絡む問題だけに、話題になっている。日本のマスコミが全く報道しないのは、奇怪なことであるが、いつものことではあるが、大本営発表ばかりのマスコミになれば、戦争はいつも負け戦になるが、本件の大本営はどこにあるのだろうか。しかし、普天間基地の問題は、ほぼ、米国内の政治においても、このふたりの大政治家が発言するようになって、閉鎖に向かって決着がついたように思うがどうだろうか。ロン・ポール議員とフランク議員は、米国の良心とも呼ばれる尊敬されている政治家であるからだ。それにしても、菅内閣は、民草をすてて、官になって、米国の軍事勢力の走り使いとなったのは残念である。米国の中の情勢の変化など、関心がないらしい。小泉・竹中政治経済よりもたちの悪い、旧態依然の左翼独裁政治の横行を許してはならない。http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rep-barney-frank/why-we-must-reduce-milita_b_636051.html?view=screen

前略 党派を超えて意見が一致したとしている。 But we must not allow honest disagreement over some issues to interfere with our ability to work together when we do agree.

By far the single most important of these is our current initiative to include substantial reductions in the projected level of American military spending as part of future deficit reduction efforts. For decades, the subject of military expenditures has been glaringly absent from public debate. Yet the Pentagon budget for 2010 is $693 billion -- more than all other discretionary spending programs combined. Even subtracting the cost of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, military spending still amounts to over 42% of total spending.

It is irrefutably clear to us that if we do not make substantial cuts in the projected levels of Pentagon spending, we will do substantial damage to our economy and dramatically reduce our quality of life.

We are not talking about cutting the money needed to supply American troops in the field. Once we send our men and women into battle, even in cases where we may have opposed going to war, we have an obligation to make sure that our servicemembers have everything they need. And we are not talking about cutting essential funds for combating terrorism; we must do everything possible to prevent any recurrence of the mass murder of Americans that took place on September 11, 2001.

Immediately after World War II, with much of the world devastated and the Soviet Union becoming increasingly aggressive, America took on the responsibility of protecting virtually every country that asked for it. Sixty-five years later, we continue to play that role long after there is any justification for it, and currently American military spending makes up approximately 44% of all such expenditures worldwide. The nations of Western Europe now collectively have greater resources at their command than we do, yet they continue to depend overwhelmingly on American taxpayers to provide for their defense. According to a recent article in the New York Times, "Europeans have boasted about their social model, with its generous vacations and early retirements, its national health care systems and extensive welfare benefits, contrasting it with the comparative harshness of American capitalism. Europeans have benefited from low military spending, protected by NATO and the American nuclear umbrella."

When our democratic allies are menaced by larger, hostile powers, there is a strong argument to be made for supporting them. But the notion that American taxpayers get some benefit from extending our military might worldwide is deeply flawed. And the idea that as a superpower it is our duty to maintain stability by intervening in civil disorders virtually anywhere in the world often generates anger directed at us and may in the end do more harm than good.

We believe that the time has come for a much quicker withdrawal from Iraq than the President has proposed. We both voted against that war, but even for those who voted for it, there can be no justification for spending over $700 billion dollars of American taxpayers' money on direct military spending in Iraq since the war began, not including the massive, estimated long-term costs of the war. We have essentially taken on a referee role in a civil war, even mediating electoral disputes.

In order to create a systematic approach to reducing military spending, we have convened a Sustainable Defense Task Force consisting of experts on military expenditures that span the ideological spectrum. The task force has produced a detailed report with specific recommendations for cutting Pentagon spending by approximately $1 trillion over a ten year period. It calls for eliminating certain Cold War weapons and scaling back our commitments overseas. Even with these changes, the United States would still be immeasurably stronger than any nation with which we might be engaged, and the plan will in fact enhance our security rather than diminish it.

We are currently working to enlist the support of other members of Congress for our initiative. Along with our colleagues Senator Ron Wyden and Congressman Walter Jones, we have addressed a letter to the President's National Committee on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform, which he has convened to develop concrete recommendations for reducing the budget deficit. We will make it clear to leaders of both parties that substantial reductions in military spending must be included in any future deficit reduction package. We pledge to oppose any proposal that fails to do so.

In the short term, rebuilding our economy and creating jobs will remain our nation's top priority. But it is essential that we begin to address the issue of excessive military spending in order to ensure prosperity in the future. We may not agree on what to do with the estimated $1 trillion in savings, but we do agree that nothing either of us cares deeply about will be possible if we do not begin to face this issue now.

ラジオ番組の解説もある。米国の世界における軍事力の展開を著しく削減する為に国防総省の予算削減を目指している。

|

« Tsuruta Koji--I cared for you | トップページ | Handlers »

コメント

コメントを書く



(ウェブ上には掲載しません)


コメントは記事投稿者が公開するまで表示されません。



トラックバック

この記事のトラックバックURL:
http://app.cocolog-nifty.com/t/trackback/209267/48882836

この記事へのトラックバック一覧です: Barney Frank:

» CIAは実は無能なダメ機関⇒支配の中核を成す騙し「エリートは超優秀」の崩壊 [日本を守るのに右も左もない]
ブログ『杉並からの情報発信です』が、『雁屋哲の美味しんぼ日記』2010年7月11日「鳩山由紀夫氏から菅直人氏へ(2)」を紹介し、その情報発信を呼びかけている。 以下に記事の全文を転載します。長文ですが「目から鱗」の情報が満載ですので是非最後までお読みください。そして友人、知人への情報拡散をお願いします。 それによると、CIAというのは実は無能極まりないダメ機関らしい。そのダメ機関CIAが唯一成功したのが日本らしい。 いつも応援ありがとうございます。 ...... [続きを読む]

受信: 2010年7月15日 22時41分

« Tsuruta Koji--I cared for you | トップページ | Handlers »